We had the grievance meeting concerning the experience Husband has had at his workplace in the beginning of the month. It was attended by our union rep, Husband and myself. From the employer’s side came the treasurer, who had been tasked with investigating our grievance.
I can’t deny, I felt a bit bad for her. After Husband’s boss left in July, the treasurer had been thrown in and has had to sort everything out from staff rotas etc. while training the new manager. So she hasn’t been able to get any information from her regarding our claims. But she did use the fact that Husband’s boss isn’t there anymore as a shield for a lot of the stuff we were concerned about – when it is in fact the whole organization who is at fault. Everyone is responsible for ensuring they are compliant with Equality and Diversity in the workplace. It’s as though there’s a culture there of that this kind of behaviour is acceptable. Nobody seems to challenge it, anyway, and that means accepting it, in my book.
Husband still has not had any hours since the end of July. The union rep queried this and what the treasurer said is that while Husband did put his holidays in the calendar, as he had not put his availability in the calendar, he was not scheduled to work any shifts.
Apparently when Husband’s boss was leaving, the treasurer took over putting together the rotas for the summer. The treasurer told the boss and deputy that she would be doing this based on what was put in the calendar, and to cascade this information to the staff so they would put their availability in the calendar.
They don’t seem to have told Husband this. In addition he went in with his timesheet in the beginning of August and verbally told the deputy he was available to work. They said they might have some work for him the following week, but of course we heard nothing. Can’t help but think the deputy is responsible for a lot of the upset Husband has gone through.
What really grinds my gears as well is that Husband has for three whole years while volunteering and later working there, always been given his shifts by text. Every. Single. Week. Why would he just understand that the procedure was different, unless he was told what to do?
We learnt that the workplace are in severe trouble financially due to parents either being in poor financial straits themselves or for simply not paying their bills. According to the treasurer, they’ve now had to sell some of the debt on to debt collection as the workplace is stretched very thin financially.
The treasurer did not say it directly but implied it was the main reason why Husband’s boss was asked to leave as she’d given people too many chances and agreed to let them pay in installments.
Because of this they will not be using any relief workers at the workplace apart from the holidays now, as they are contractually obligated to pay the manager and deputy, and the two apprentices they have.
The workplace has taken the log we have kept with what has happened to Husband, and also our list of Reasonable Adjustments, and will respond to these. Eventually.
Husband still wants to pursue the grievance as he feels it’s important to see through to the finish, but he has resigned himself to the fact that he now needs to consider his options.
Back to jobhunting, now. He naturally finds this quite daunting as he has not done this for three years.
This time it will be different though. Husband now has a diagnosis of Asperger’s Syndrome and we are exploring what support there is available for him through Jobcentreplus and Remploy.
All the same, I am worried about him and his mental health as I will be going back to work six days a week starting Monday. I wish i could spend more time at home to support him, but as the main breadwinner it’s just not possible. We need the money now. More than ever.